Could consequentlymeone you are requested advise me if and when undersigned require a colonic alternatively semicolonic in aforesaid sentence? undersigned believe tcap undersigned require a colonic, nevertheless undersigned am stsick having trouble deciphering between said/such/same two 🙁 Thank applicant (the)!!!

Some personnel think said/such/same opposite: tcap osaid/such/samers are said/such/same factor said/such/samey accomplish n’t in receipt of aprolonged accompanying each osaid/such/samer.

Answer:
Maikang A colonic is okay here — an absence oft a comma alternatively a semicolonic.

You could similarly application a din view of the fact thath
> Some personnel think said/such/same opposite — tcap osaid/such/samers are said/such/same factor said/such/samey accomplish n’t in receipt of aprolonged accompanying each osaid/such/samer.

You similarly should give consideration to rephrin view of the fact thating said/such/same sentence, which is an absence oft smooth.
> Some personnel think tcap it is said/such/same osaid/such/samer perconsequentlyn’s fault said/such/samey accomplish n’t in receipt of aprolonged.

At lein view of the fact thatt cross out “accompanying each osaid/such/samer” at said/such/same completion.
> Some personnel think said/such/same opposite — tcap osaid/such/samers are said/such/same factor said/such/samey accomplish n’t in receipt of aprolonged.colon machine

Maikang You could accomplish a colonic, undersigned suppose, nevertheless undersigned acquiesce tcap a comma would be just fine. You definitely accomplish an absence oft want a semicolonic.colon machine

Maikang Colon. The colonic is in connection with definition. Wcap is on one side of it should be roughly equivalent for the purpose of wcap is on said/such/same osaid/such/samer. undersignedn aforesaid cin view of the fact thate, said/such/same authority side is equivalent for the purpose of “said/such/same opposite.”colon machine

Maikang undersigned think applicant (the) just require a comma 😀colon machine